🔗 Share this article

Market specialists have voiced deep doubt regarding bullish predictions that US energy majors will swiftly invest vast sums of dollars to rebuild the country's broken production facilities.

Demand for Absolute Protections

Without an “iron-clad guarantee” of complete repayment from the Washington, experts believe global energy giants to move with significant hesitation.

“It would be hasty to discuss any potential investments,” a spokesperson commented this weekend.

The optimistic schedule of less than 18 months was boldly outlined. However, realistic assessments suggest a different picture.

A More Realistic Schedule

“Chances are going to take multiple years for any kind of production bounce,” said one industry expert.

The analysis indicates energy firms would likely spend:

• Initial phase: Sorting through new government and security contracts.
• Following phase: Investing in overhaul of facilities.
• The third year: Starting to boost production.

This suggests an boost of around half a million bpd possibly by 2029.

Desire Versus Appetite for Investment

There is a critical difference between multinationals’ interest and their readiness to commit heavily.

“In my view their curiosity is an eight, on a scale of ten. I think their appetite is a four or five, because there is a lack of certainty yet.”

Seasoned diplomats in the region echo this caution. The thinking is that companies will publicly express enthusiasm while actually acting with deliberate slowness.

The Colossal Cost

The required outlay would be enormous. Research analysis suggest that increasing production by between half a million and a million bpd would require over $10 billion in funding over several years.

Yet, restoring production to peak levels of around 2.5 million barrels per day could require a monumental $80 billion to $90 billion over many more years.

The Unanswered Issue of Taxpayer Funding

The idea of energy companies being paid back by the government has been often mentioned. However, concrete details on this proposal have so far not been announced.

This lack of clarity is the main impediment behind the sector's caution. Operators seek protection against political risk and the possibility that a future president could renege on any promise.

“They must be shielded from nationalization, that we’ve experienced in Venezuela before.”

Ultimately, while political promises runs high, the practical challenges suggest a path of measured steps for any major financial commitment in the country's energy industry.